SPC Wilson asked Sectary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about why they do not have the armored protection on the vehicles they are using today in Iraq. This questions was noted was planted by a reporter. While this question has merit the focus on the issues raised by this question and the assumption that the military is not doing what it should or could is just so MSM bull shit.
2Slick has some great information on this topic.
I logged well over 1,500 miles driving around Iraq, and I never even saw an “armored” humvee. I didn’t complain- mostly because I was well aware that my father never had any armored humvees in Vietnam, and my grandfather certainly didn’t have any armored humvees during WWII.
It is a sad fact that the focus is on this and not on what our great Solders, Sailors, Airmen, Guardsmen, and Marines are doing there. It would be very nice to have every vehicle protected by the best possible solution that America can provide. The facts of life is that even the most heavily armored vehicles (Tanks) have vulnerabilities. Even the aircraft flying at high altitudes are at risk. If the Military is ignoring the ability to armor then that would be a story. But…. That is not the case.
Why does the MSM focus in a condescending way on the end results that they expect. Do they not see there own shortcomings.
Why does the MSM hate our Military so much? What can we do to change this (short of shooting them)
Tonight on CSPAN there was a lot of questions from reporters about why every vehicle in Iraq is not armored. The fact that there is a plan and that they are on plan shoes that the Military is working on the issue. It will not be fixed over night. The Press should not let the Military not do what it can to protect our Americans. But they should also GET REAL!
God Speed
Semper Fi