The evil of Manliness
Mar 26th 2006MichaelAnti-America
Now is this what the cowed left believe? WOW
But the manliness of the Bush White House has a darker side that has proved more curse than advantage. The prime example is the war in Iraq: the administration’s assertion of the right to engage in preemptive and unilateral war; the resolute avoidance of debate about the “slam-dunk” intelligence on weapons of mass destruction; the determined lack of introspection or self-doubt about the course of the war; and the swaggering dismissal of dissenting views as the carping of those not on the team.
The dissenting views are just feelings, why does the left think we care how they feel?
Now is this just another feminist whining bitch? I think so!
Now she wants to change the rules for her own benefit…
Mansfield writes that he wants to “convince skeptical readers — above all, educated women” — that “irrational manliness deserves to be endorsed by reason.” Sorry, professor: You lose. What this country could use is a little less manliness — and a little more of what you would describe as womanly qualities: restraint, introspection, a desire for consensus, maybe even a touch of self-doubt.
SELF-DOUBT? WHAT?
Ruth, do you really HATE America?
3 Comments »
3 Responses to “The evil of Manliness”
Raven on 30 Mar 2006 at 17:24 #
Yep and educated women who use their feelings to make their choices are really STOOPID women. Guess that is what a feminist really is actually. Feelings have a place in this world, but that place is NOT in the Oval office for sure. Or any political office.
To say that women’s *feelings* are more valuable than *irrational manliness* is STOOPID as well. I think Bill Clinton was and is a feminist LOL…as are liberals and democraps in general-(both sexes)…wussy ass wimps who allow their *feelings* to control national policy and lead the world to percieve America as being weak…9-11 happened because the terrorists thought we wouldn’t fight back. It took a man to make that decision (Bush)…
a woman would have hemmed and hawed and waited til the perfect moment came along and would have taken into consideration whose effin feelings would be hurt and….you get the point.
(NOT ME. I WOULD HAVE NUKED THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST)
And Rightly So! » Manliness?? Whats wrong with it? on 31 Mar 2006 at 18:32 #
[...] While I was visiting Michael’s house yesterday I read his take on some article he found in the WaPo…some bimbobytch wrote about the Bush Whitehouse and…manliness. I got to thinking about it and it’s a bunch of bulloney. I have a new theory about what’s behind everything that’s wrong with the Bush administration: manliness. [...]
And Rightly So! » Blog Archive » Thinking Bloggers on 29 Mar 2007 at 10:25 #
[...] Michael: He who just makes me THINK irregardless to what his posts are about. I’m biased here; he’s my best blog friend and deserves every award there is. [...]