Criminals
The Swift Raids prove the Criminals wet-backs are hurting Americans
GREELEY - The line of applicants hoping to fill jobs vacated by undocumented workers taken away by immigration agents at the Swift & Co. meat-processing plant earlier this week was out the door Thursday.
And The Rocky Mountain News Still won’t call the wetbacks what they are: illegal criminals who are stealing American Identities (yes, they are posing as you and me).
In 2002 Swift & Co laid off a large portion of it American workforce because they were making on average $20.00 per hour. These Americans might get lucky to get $12.00 per hour now because of this criminal activity.
The Executive staff of this Swift & Co should be SHOT in the head with a 22 cal bullet because they are breaking the law and hurting Americans in the process. They are not allowed to use the Ken Lay excuse of sleeping at the helm.
Deport the criminal Mexicans and shoot the American executives that promote this shit..
Then Fire any representative that supports Mexicans instead of Americans.
18 Comments »
18 Responses to “Criminals”


Raven on 20 Dec 2006 at Wed 20 December 2006 17:30:28 #
Well said. (hiccup) lol
You have the plan correct:
Business leaders must be held accountable for these unAmerican practices
Illegal criminals must be booted out
Stop electing wimps who support the illegals before they support Americans.
meatbrain on 20 Dec 2006 at Wed 20 December 2006 19:08:08 #
I’m so proud of you, Michael. You’re not afraid to use the twin tactics of racist language and incitement to murder in your heroic quest to keep the American bloodline pure. How very white of you.
Michael on 20 Dec 2006 at Wed 20 December 2006 20:16:40 #
Hey madcow, fuck off.
Raven on 20 Dec 2006 at Wed 20 December 2006 21:18:30 #
Hey looky it’s the Meat Head…he has balls after all. (NOT)
Whats racist about this post MH?? Calling the IMMIGRANTS illegals?? Calling them wetbacks? It’s what they are.
That’s not racist. It’s fact.
Incitement for murder? Oh go away and masturbate in a corner. Michael was using tough language in the sense that American business leaders should be held accountable for unethical practices- something you liberal whiney ass people should be agreeing with.
meatbrain on 21 Dec 2006 at Thu 21 December 2006 03:06:19 #
That’s the spirit, Mikey. We can always count on you for a tired, unimaginative comeback with exactly zero semantic content.
Yes, little coward: “wetbacks” is a racist epithet. And the call to have people “SHOT in the head with a 22 cal bullet” is just the sort of eliminationist rhetoric your kind uses constantly. It has nothing to do with holding people accountable — it has to do with fantasizing about committing murder.
AirborneVet on 21 Dec 2006 at Thu 21 December 2006 10:38:08 #
Most of the world’s problems would be more easily solved with a high powered sniper rifle.
I didn’t use the same language as Mike did, but I basically said the same thing on my blog the other week.
The word “wetbacks” is only racist if you say it is. It originated because many illegals have had to swim across the Rio Grande to get here.
It’s really no different than the word “nigger”. It’s only racist because you say it is. I know many black people who call each other “nigger” all the time, but if a white person does it, all hell breaks loose. Give me a break! It is socially ok, of course, for someone to call a white person “honky” or “cracker”. Why? Because only white people can be racist.
That, my dear meatbrain, is the kind of logic you are putting forward. That is the kind of logic that makes no sense. “That’s insane troll logic!”, Xander Harris from BTVS, Season 5.
meatbrain on 21 Dec 2006 at Thu 21 December 2006 19:38:17 #
“Most of the world’s problems would be more easily solved with a high powered sniper rifle.”
“Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.” — Isaac Asimov
“I didn’t use the same language as Mike did, but I basically said the same thing on my blog the other week.”
Wow. One racist agrees with another racist. What a revelation!
“The word “wetbacks” is only racist if you say it is. It originated because many illegals have had to swim across the Rio Grande to get here.”
False. It is racist because it is an established slur directed at people of a specific race. It has nothing to do with whether the people of that race are here illegally, because it is used when the speaker (in this case, Mikey) has no actual knowledge regarding the legal status of the people to whom he applies the epithet.
Michael on 21 Dec 2006 at Thu 21 December 2006 20:45:34 #
Mad Cow disease your only argument is that we are a racist and must be white which you don’t know our heritage. You have no argument. Who says it is an established slur? You. Who said it is directed at a specific race of people instead of people that cross the American boarder illegally? You? You make generalizations that have no base for argument.
Isaac Asimov was a Communists and a pacifist. Why do I care what he thought?
You are a sheep.
Raven on 21 Dec 2006 at Thu 21 December 2006 22:56:06 #
OK Meat Brain let’s cut thru the bullshit here.
Do you agree that those who cross the borders from Mexico into the US, without proper papers and id, are in this country illegally??
Do you realize how much of your earned money goes towards supporting these illegals? In free medical care, housing, food, clothing, college education for their kids?
Would you be at all concerned if one of these people stole YOUR identity in order to get a job? Does it bother you that if you’re involved in an auto accident and an illegal immigrant is driving the other car, you have no recourse when YOUR insurance rate skyrockets because YOUR insurance has to pay everything?
Would you not hold to a low level of respect- any American business that lays off hundreds of American workers, moves shop to the middle of no where…and hires illegals at much less pay? That knows the illegals have stolen ID’s of Americans?
Do you care for your fellow American who lost a job to a non American??
These things don’t bother you at all?
meatbrain on 22 Dec 2006 at Fri 22 December 2006 03:08:54 #
“…your only argument is that we are a racist and must be white…”
False. I said that your behavior is very white.
“Who says it is an established slur?”
The word “wetback” has been used for years as a racist slur against those of Hispanic heritage. You can pretend to be ignorant of this, but that doesn’t change the fact that the word is a racial slur.
Of course, it may be that you aren’t pretending to be ignorant. That seems quite likely, in fact.
“Isaac Asimov was a Communists”
Evidence, please. You are again speaking from ignorance. It seems to be your only talent.
Raven: Your endless stream of rhetorical questions merely highlight the fact that you haven’t bothered to examine the evidence in the case of the Swift raids. Of course, you won’t even try to do so — since facts tend to make maintaining your hatred much, much harder.
Michael on 22 Dec 2006 at Fri 22 December 2006 11:42:06 #
Mad Cow disease your only argument is that I am a racist and ignorant. Coming from you that means nothing.
I am glad you know what you think…
meatbrain on 22 Dec 2006 at Fri 22 December 2006 16:07:53 #
“…your only argument is that I am a racist and ignorant…”
Those are observations, actually, not arguments. But tell me: When you use a racist slur, what description would fit you better than ‘racist’? When you accuse a man of being “a Communists” without any actual knowledge of his political philosophy, what description would fit you better than ‘ignorant’?
Raven on 22 Dec 2006 at Fri 22 December 2006 17:29:24 #
Hey Michael do you smell burning meat around here??
I do. It stinks. get out the bleach…we got some cleaning to do.
Oh yeah…when are we going to the shooting range to practice hitting our targets???
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder on 22 Dec 2006 at Fri 22 December 2006 19:50:20 #
Ah Michael, I am jealous, you have a lefty troll on your blog that doesnt get it.
They can be SO easy!
Raven on 23 Dec 2006 at Sat 23 December 2006 10:06:23 #
Dennis- MeatHead isn’t a troll. He’s a rotten pce of meat that likes to think he’s scientific- he likes evidence based debate. He’s a liberal without a heart-which is odd these days. He’s also a wimp and wuss.
A total turn off.
meatbrain on 23 Dec 2006 at Sat 23 December 2006 11:52:05 #
“…he likes evidence based debate.”
Which is, in Raven’s teeny little world, an unforgivable sin… and quite frightening, as well. Her trepidation at the mere thought of an evidence-based debate is why she fled from the debate to which she herself challenged me.
AirborneVet on 26 Dec 2006 at Tue 26 December 2006 21:36:30 #
Hmmmm….
Evidence-based debate is proper debate; however, I have not seen any actual evidence in the comment section, only opinions- including mine. Here’s another one…
Isaac Asimov was a great science fiction writer as was L. Ron Hubbard, but only one was goofy enough to start a ‘religion’ (cult?).
AirborneVet on 26 Dec 2006 at Tue 26 December 2006 21:59:37 #
Here’s a link for Meatbrain. Enjoy!
http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/12/22/todays_white_supremacists/
If it doesn’t work as a link, please copy and paste in your browser. Don’t worry, it’s safe. I checked it out.