Semper Fi Act of 2008

Senators Introduce Semper Fi Act of 2008
Bill Stops Berkeley Earmarks and Transfers Funds to Marine Corps

February 6th, 2008 - Washington, D.C. - Today, U.S. Senators Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), Saxby Chambliss (R-Georgia), Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-Oklahoma), John Cornyn (R-Texas), James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), and David Vitter (R-Louisiana) introduced the Semper Fi Act of 2008. The bill would rescind over $2 million in hidden earmarks for Berkeley, California in the 2008 Omnibus Appropriations bill, and transfer the funds to the Marine Corps. U.S. Congressman John Campbell (R-California) is introducing a companion bill in the House of Representatives.
Last week, the City Council of Berkeley voted to oust Marine Corps recruiters from their downtown office, saying the Marines were “uninvited and unwelcome intruders.” Berkeley officials also voted to give the radical protest group Code Pink space outside the recruitment office and urged them to “impede, passively or actively” the work of Marine Corps recruiters.
One earmark provides $243,000 in taxpayer dollars for the organization Chez Panisse to create gourmet organic school lunches in the Berkeley School District. Chez Panisse is dedicated to “environmental harmony” and their menu features “Comté cheese soufflé with mâche salad,” “Meyer lemon éclairs with huckleberry coulis,” and “Chicory salad with creamy anchovy vinaigrette and olive toast.”
Another earmark would spend $975,000 in taxpayer dollars for the University of California in Berkeley Matsui Center for Politics and Public Service, to create a new endowment and cataloging the papers of Congressman Robert Matsui. U.C. Berkeley currently already has a $3.5 billion endowment.
Senator DeMint: “Berkeley needs to learn that their actions have consequences. Patriotic American taxpayers won’t sit quietly while Berkeley insults our brave Marines and tries to run them out of town. Berkeley City Council members have shown complete ingratitude to our military and their families, and the city doesn’t deserve a single dime of special pet project handouts.”
Senator Cornyn: “The Berkeley City Council insulted our troops and offended people across the country. If the U.S. Marines are not good enough for Berkeley, neither are taxpayer dollars Congress would have sent there this year. That city closed its doors on the same individuals taking bullets on the front lines while fighting for the safety and freedom of families in Berkeley and throughout America.”
Senator Vitter: “The actions of the City Council of Berkeley are in stark contrast to beliefs of the vast majority of Americans who recognize and honor the service and sacrifice of our U.S. Marines. This is simply unacceptable and those funds could be better utilized by the Marine Corps.”
Dr. Coburn: “The actions by the city of Berkeley are deplorable and insulting to those who are serving and those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice to protect the very freedoms that are being exercised to insult them. I know I stand with the majority of Americans in thanking our service men and women for their selfless service to our nation.”
Senator Inhofe: “Unfortunately, those on the Berkeley city council do not seem to understand the sacrifice of the brave men and women of the United States Marine Corps. By interfering with military recruiting, the city of Berkeley is hampering our ability to protect this nation. While the city of Berkeley and the protestors are free to say whatever they like, free speech is not a protection from consequence.”
Senator Chambliss: “We need to send a strong message that our military personnel deserve our strongest support. Georgia is a proud military state, and my constituents will be out outraged to know that during a time of war, their taxpayers dollars have been used to reward folks who have insulted and disparaged those who defend this nation every day.”  

4 Comments »

4 Responses to “Semper Fi Act of 2008”

  1. Stephen Denney on 28 Feb 2008 at Thu 28 February 2008 14:26:45 #

    Two points: 1. the menu of Chez Panisse restaurant has nothing to do with the school lunches served in Berkeley. 2. the University of California is a state institution, has an ROTC program, does not oppose military recruiting and its chancellor denounced the Berkeley City Council action. It makes no sense to punish the university for the actions of the city council.

  2. Raven on 28 Feb 2008 at Thu 28 February 2008 19:33:04 #

    Steven actually yes, this is how it works. When a city council takes such an obnoxious stand on something like this, people call them on it. When the council did nothing to alter it’s opinion, people do have the right to censor community businesses. It’s called freedom.

    And, since this city council decided the Marines were not welcome, why should federal money be given to said city? Who will defend this city against any enemy at any time? Not the council members I can assure you of that. Not the cook at the Chez restaurant…and not a professor from the college…but Marines will.

    Code Pink, Nancy Pelosi and their ilk don’t deserve to be defended by the likes of Marines- but hey, I guess these treasonous asses are Americans.

  3. Stephen Denney on 02 Mar 2008 at Sun 02 March 2008 00:02:49 #

    To Raven:

    You ask: “Who will defend this city against any enemy at any time? Not the council members I can assure you of that. Not the cook at the Chez restaurant…and not a professor from the college…but Marines will.”

    But what about those who are trained in U.C. ROTC programs or who are recruited on campus, won’t they also be defending the country? The University of California at Berkeley does not fall within the jurisdiction of the city of Berkeley. Nor does it have any control over decisions made by the city council. It makes no sense to punish this state institution with an ROTC program for the actions of the city council.

  4. Raven on 03 Mar 2008 at Mon 03 March 2008 17:52:51 #

    Steven you have a point.