Archive for the 'GOP' Category

Sick of "Inherited"

Someone emailed this to me

The Washington Post babbled again today about Obama inheriting a huge deficit from Bush, blah blah blah. 

Amazingly enough, a lot of people continue to swallow this nonsense.

So once more, let’s try a short civics lesson.

Budgets do not come from the White House.  They come from Congress, and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.  They controlled the budget process for FY 2008 and FY 2009, as well as FY 2010 and FY 2011.  In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.  For FY 2009, though, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office.  At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets.And where was Barack Obama during this time?  He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009. Let’s remember what the deficits looked like during that period:

clip_image001

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.  That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.  After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.  If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell,  what Obama is saying is HE inherited a deficit that HE voted for and then HE voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

Any questions about who inherited what?

3 Comments »

Advice for Mr. McCain

Some advice for John McCain?

NEW ORLEANS — John McCain got mixed reviews today from some of the conservative movement’s top donors and leaders after he addressed — then took questions from — members of the secretive Council for National Policy.

Secretive? Who are these people???

Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America said she asked him about the nearly 40 percent of women in America who bear children out of wedlock and how he would address that problem.

“His response was to say his pro-life record [in Congress] answered that,” Mrs. Crouse said. “Well, I’m proud of his pro-life record, but this is not a pro-life issue but of promoting marriage and the idea that children belong within marriage, so I was not happy with his response.”

She has a point…but I don’t necessarily agree with her.

“On the other hand, he will not find an electorate that is inspired, that will plant signs in their yards, that will mobilize their neighbors and do everything they can to get him elected. They will go to the polls, and that is about it,” she said.

That about sums up the spirit of so many who will back McCain…they will do so without any cheering.

Unless, she added, “he chooses a strong social conservative vice presidential candidate.” Because she represents a nonprofit organization, she could not mention anyone specifically to fill that bill.

However, she has been known to admire former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, both of whom also sought the Republican nomination this year.

AHHH! NO…not the Huckster, puLEEze. I could stand Fred, and his presence in this would ignite the fires of A LOT of people.

1 Comment »

Democrats for McCain; Republicans for Obama

Evidence of Republicans turning left is growing. There’s a twist here too- Democrats coming right.

Who they gonna vote for?

McCainocrats vs. Obamacans?

The two new political demographics — like Soccer moms and NASCAR dads before them — are quickly emerging as the potential election-busters of the 2008 presidential race.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, numbers emerging from polls and primary results show that Sen. John McCain — who has alienated conservatives as he courts independents and moderate Democrats — holds an advantage over Sen. Barack Obama in the race for crossover votes.

There are now more McCainocrats than Obamacans — about 14 percent of Democrats say they would vote for Mr. McCain today instead of Mr. Obama, but just 8 percent of Republicans say they would vote for the Illinois Democrat, according to a Pew Research Center survey on Feb. 28.

Cause for concern???

Additionally, 20 percent of white Democratic voters say they would defect to Mr. McCain if Mr. Obama is the Democratic Party’s nominee — twice the number who would cross over if Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton wins the nomination, Pew found.

Interesting numbers. I trust them too…of the couple of handfuls of liberal friends I have, not a one of them will cast a vote for the ObOmb or the ChillPill. McCain’s their man. Why? They don’t trust the Democratic candidates to get it right, for them or the country right now. It’s the 3am phone call factor.

Comments Off

The argument of the less evils is valid

This election cycle is causing a lot of uproar for Conservatives. The thought of John McCain being the GOP nominee is giving many of us headaches and sour stomachs. A number of bloggers have declared they will not support McCain - and this includes voting for him.

McCain deserves all the vile commentary coming at him. He’s a RINO; he’s the Democrats’ favorite Republican. He’s a man who throws temper tantrums; who supports illegal immigration and the businesses that wish to toss Americans from jobs they have always done…McCain voted against President Bush’s tax cuts; he favored a campaign finance deal that almost silenced ALL OF US.

McCain is going to be the ONE. We have choices. We can fully support him and his campaign against either Obama or Chillary…can’t say yet who will win the weak kneed, limp dicked Democrat nomination. We can snub McCain and write in our vote for Fred, or Mitt, or Ron. We can stay home and not participate at all.

No matter what we each decide to do, we will need to be patient.

Rick Moran takes note of an interview McCain gave to the German paper, SPIEGEL. He comes to the same conclusion about McCain as I did:

What a pandering, sycophantic, arrogant popinjay he is.

Indeed.

Reading that entire interview, there were places that you really weren’t sure if you were listening to a Democrat or a Republican, liberal or conservative. This is McCain’s identity and I guess we better get used to it. It is maddening, worrisome, even frightening at times. But that’s being a “maverick” I suppose.

I got ill reading it. It made me more angry to know I am probably going to vote for a man who panders to international, anti American hysteria and hyperbole. It upsets me see McCain bowing down to the EuropEon community and bash an outgoing President; it shames me to see this man go Al Bore on Global Warming, which is shady science at it’s best and downright lying and fear mongering at it’s worst.

It pisses me off to know this man claims to be a true conservative when he is anything BUT that. It bothers me a whole lot to KNOW that once he gets behind the desk in the Oval office, we’ll see an influx of illegal immigrants like we’ve never seen before. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Fat Teddy Kennedy and President McCain bring their awful shamesty legislation back to life. It wouldn’t shock me one bit to see our voices silenced with new laws about political speech including blogging to be regulated.

It’s a sad time in American history to know that the choices we have for our leader are not good for America…the potential and probable candidates will work hard to remove personal freedoms and choices from each of us.

SO voting for McCain may be the alternative to seeing Obama or Chillary become President; but the vote will come with a lot of mistrust, total disgust and some loss of sleep. Doing the popular thing might be to vote for McCain, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do. The argument of the less evils is valid, I suppose in this election.

Comments Off

Grass-roots donors’ rebellion

Hmm…Does the GOP not understand what is happening with it’s base??

The Republican National Committee, hit by a grass-roots donors’ rebellion over President Bush’s immigration policy, has fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, Ralph Z. Hallow will report Friday in The Washington Times.

They FIRED ALL of the staff??

What’s going on here??

“The phone-bank employees were terminated,” RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt wrote by e-mail in response to questions sent by The Times. “This was not an easy decision. The first and primary motivating factor was the state of the phone bank technology, which was outdated and difficult to maintain. The RNC was advised that we would soon need an entire new system to remain viable.”

Why not keep the folks on the payroll until the new systems are updated?

Is there any truth to this?

There has been a sharp decline in contributions from RNC phone solicitations, another fired staffer said, reporting that many former donors flatly refuse to give more money to the national party if Mr. Bush and the Senate Republicans insist on supporting what these angry contributors call “amnesty” for illegal aliens.

“Everyone donor in 50 states we reached has been angry, especially in the last month and a half, and for 99 percent of them immigration is the No. 1 issue,” said the former employee.

I’ll admit this: They called me and I told them WHERE TO STUFF their request for donations. Ahem…I also hung up on them. Why? Because the GOP has pissed me off with this Illegal Amnesty Bullshit, that’s why. And I immediately went over to Tancredo’s site and donated more cash to his campaign. Enough said.

Cross Posted @ ARS

Comments Off

Tanc’s You Tubes

Hey check it out…The Tanc has a You Tube Page with lots of video coverage for interviews with Tom, and his opinons about the issues that affect all of us.

Here’s an example:

There are LOTS more at this site. Don’t forget to check out his campaign site and blog; and if you’re interested in joining the Tancredo For President Blog Roll, email me.

Cross Posted @ ARS

Comments Off

Newt Gingrich: The Right Ideas

Newt Gingrich can’t explain his high ratings…

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Monday he is still eyeing a run for president and can’t explain polls that show him ranked near the top-tier candidates for the Republican nomination although he has not formally announced.

“It’s sort of frightening sometimes,” Gingrich said. “Sometimes the guys who aren’t running are doing better than the guys who are running. Why would you want to start running if you’re doing better by not running than you would if you were running? I can’t explain it.”

I can… He has ideas and the right attitude so many Conservatives and Republicans are looking for. I don’t think he would have a chance at winning an election, but he has the right thinking so many other candidates are lacking.

Comments Off

I’m so tired of voting because the person is the lesser of two evils

Tom Tancredo spoke at the CPAC meeting over the weekend.

“I’m so tired of voting because the person is the lesser of two evils, I want to be able to vote for somebody I believe is leading a crusade, somebody who I actually want to participate in that crusade because they inspire me to do so.

I may not be that person, I understand, But look for that in whoever it is you’re going to support.”

Read more here.

1 Comment »

CPAC Isn’t for Conservatives Anymore

I’ve been out of touch all weekend with work. As I sift through news sites and the blogs, I came across the latest Ann Coulter “scandal”: She spoke the forbidden word…and she’s being vilified for this at many right to center blogs.

Forbidden word: FAGGOT. Oh for the luv of words. My thong is all twisted and I can’t breathe now. (rolling my eyes)

I have called John Edwards a faggot because he has the look and mannerisms of one. I have used choice words to describe many people on the left. I have used foul language all my life. After all it’s a free country. I accept responsibility for my words too and always stand by them. If people don’t like it, TOUGH SHIT. Don’t listen to me then.

Instead of focusing on what truly matters, these bloggers are spanking their own monkeys over a non issue. And I’m SICK of it.

What’s really important is how the people who attended this CPAC political ogry fest could even come to any conclusion that one Rudy Giuliani is DA man who should be our next President…he who would steal away my right to own a gun to defend myself; he would continue to support the murder of unborn children- using vacuum machines and doctors services paid for by MY fucking tax dollars; he who will create a sub nation here in the US for illegal immigrants to continue bleeding us all out of resources, again, paid for by OUR hard earned money. This support going to one of the most blatant and obvious RINO’s there are…PISSES me off.

And the support for DA man comes from those who call themselves CONSERVATIVES. These bloggers and others do not speak for me. I refuse to sign a stupid petition proclaiming Ann Coulter be ousted from speaking at CPAC events. What ever happened to free speech, even if it offends some? What’s going on with people who claim to be conservative??? Have they all softened up? have they all given in to the lies and bullshit candidates like Giuliani spit out?

Mike @ Cold Fury says this:

And all you fartknockers strutting around like peacocks at CPAC, kissing rings and harrumphing ponderously from Bloggers’ Row, need to realize something: you’re being played, by a bunch of megalomaniac apple-polishing blowhards — most of whom will probably be forced to drop out of the race after the Superduperawesomestever Tuesday primary vote next year (next year!) sends them scurrying back home with the stale miasma of defeat displacing that fog of ego now obscuring everyone’s vision. That’s NEXT FUCKING YEAR, Poindexter, by which time the warm, fuzzy feeling (conjured by all those pairs of blogger lips plastered over all those pasty RINO asscheeks) currently floating dreams of glory like so many boats on the Potomac will have evaporated.

I concur. Mike is 100% correct.

And Linda shares much of my concern here:

I am more offended by the “conservatives” at CPAC who welcomed and applauded a gun-grabbing liberal candidate for president who is pro-abortion that he thinks our tax dollars should pay for them, who is pro-gay rights, pro-amnesty for llegals, who not only worked tirelessly to create a sanctuary state for illegal immigrants but gave them free healthcare at the taxpayers’ expense than I am offended by Ann’s comment.

I am more offended by the “conservative” bloggers at CPAC who applauded a liberal candidate for president who supports mccain-feingold than I am offended by Ann’s comment.

It pissed me off that people jump ON the wagon that liberals drive. Conservatives are not supposed to be about big government and to ride the rosy fat asses of those who are NOT conservatives is just wrong…this causes me to lose ALL of my respect for the CPAC which should rename itself the LPAC (Liberal Political Action Committee).

My donations to CPAC have ended as of NOW. Until they start looking at important issues of those of us who call ourselves conservatives vs. getting themselves all caught up in the spotlight of self fondling egos and being childish attention seekers. Want-a-be journalists they all are…and they are hijacking the very party they claim to represent- these bloggers and others. No thanks. I may as well hand over my money to John Edwards’ campaign if I support CPAC. The truth will hurt some…so be it. These people need to look long and hard into the reflection they see in their mirrors. They’re all becoming RINOS.

Comments Off

The Dumbo Quagmire

Has John Dumbo Murtha lost his ability to influence his own party? Has the old coot managed to show, in bright colors, just how torn apart the Lemoncrats (TM) really are? It appears that way.

The plan was bold: By tying President Bush’s $100 billion war request to strict standards of troop safety and readiness, Democrats believed they could grab hold of Iraq war policy while forcing Republicans to defend sending troops into battle without the necessary training or equipment.

But a botched launch by the plan’s author, Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), has united Republicans and divided Democrats, sending the latter back to the drawing board just a week before scheduled legislative action, a score of House Democratic lawmakers said last week.

Members of both parties got wind of Black Jack’s latest attempt to cut and run, to leave the troops he so adamently claims to love and defend- without the tools they need to fight the battles they face. Dumbo Murtha is a traitor to the American military and to the American people. And it’s coming back full force at him.

“If this is going to be legislation that’s crafted in such a way that holds back resources from our troops, that is a non-starter, an absolute non-starter,” declared Rep. Jim Matheson (Utah), a leader of the conservative Blue Dog Democrats.

Murtha’s credentials as a Marine combat veteran, a critic of the war and close ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) were supposed to make him an unassailable spokesman for Democratic war policy. Instead, he has become a lightning rod for criticism from Republicans and members of his own party.

Lightening rod is a polite term. When members of his own party question the motive and ethics of Dumbo’s latest moonbat driven proposals, it says much. Of course Republicans went wild over the sneaky underhanded antics employed here- we’re supposed to do that…our job is to watch for this stuff and expose it.

The story of Murtha’s star-crossed plan illustrates the Democratic Party’s deep divisions over the Iraq war and how the new House majority has yet to establish firm control over Congress. From the beginning, Murtha acted on his own to craft a complicated legislative strategy on the war, without consulting fellow Democrats. When he chose to roll out the details on a liberal, antiwar Web site on Feb. 15, he caught even Pelosi by surprise while infuriating Democrats from conservative districts.

Then for an entire week, as members of Congress returned home for a recess, Murtha refused to speak further. Democratic leaders failed to step into the vacuum, and Republicans relentlessly attacked a plan they called a strategy to slowly bleed the war of troops and funds. By the end of the recess, Murtha’s once promising strategy was in tatters.

Yes it was and still is in tatters; because MOST people were shocked and PISSED off about it. Further, this event showed the American people just how rotten the lemons really are when it comes to all things military and war like. Dumbo Murtha shut up cause he was TOLD TO BE QUIET. Cruella Pelosi cracked her whip. There is no other reason.

Murtha, 74, the powerful chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on defense, still holds a unique position on war policy, stemming from his roots as a veteran, his close ties to the uniformed military and his long-standing alliance with Pelosi. When he first publicly called for ending the war in 2005, he commanded the attention the party’s left and right wings.

The strategy he would craft was designed to calm the nerves of the party’s conservatives by fully funding the war, while placating the antiwar left by attaching so many strings to those funds that the president would not be able to deploy all the 21,500 additional combat troops he wanted.

To be sent to battle, troops would have to have had a year’s rest between combat tours. Soldiers in Iraq could not have their tours extended beyond a year there. And the Pentagon’s “stop-loss” policy, which prevents some officers from leaving the military when their service obligations are up, would end. Troops would have to be trained in counterinsurgency and urban warfare and be sent overseas with the equipment they used in training.

I really hope this non plan of a plan is DEAD because many troops will be if this becomes law. Dumbo KNOWS this and it sickens me that he would do this to the military. It also sickens me that ANY member of the House, Republican and Lemoncrat, would endorse this.

Pelosi endorsed the plan in concept but never the details. The plan surfaced Feb. 15 in an unorthodox Murtha appearance on MoveCongress.org, an antiwar Web site affiliated with the liberal activists of MoveOn.org.

It came the day before the House voted on a nonbinding resolution opposing Bush’s additional troop deployments that Democratic leaders had been touting as a major rebuke. Murtha dismissed that vote as he promoted his coming plans regarding the war spending bill. “This vote will be the most important vote in changing the direction on this war,” he said of his proposal. “This vote will limit the options of the president and should stop the surge.”

To many Democrats, that was not only impolitic, it was disloyal.

Why the Lemoncrats feel such a NEED to pacify the likes of the MoveOn people is beyond me…these people are anti-American, not just anti war. They share beds with ANSWER- the pro-communinst activists. Do the Lemoncrats want to be associated with these people? Nevermind basing legislation upon the warped and very small numbers of people these thug groups represent…no wonder the Lemoncrats cannot do the right thing. They’re hanging with the wrong crowd! And Boss Cruella has proven she is not capable of holding her position of power. She’s not on top of things; she doesn’t have command. Her boy toy Dumbo Murtha is pushing her around.

Even after that Web appearance, some senior Democratic aides say Murtha might well have been able to save his plan if he had quickly laid it out before the Democratic caucus and marshaled Democratic leaders behind a defense. Instead, the House recessed for a week, Murtha disappeared from the media, and Democratic leaders were silent, saying they could not discuss Iraq legislation because no real plan existed.

Sabotage and surrender is not a plan. It’s a strategy. And it’s often the very backbone of these Lemoncrats like Murtha, who are too dumb to come up with anything more viable. He’s a thug. A stupid one at that…and it’s showing now. Just listening to him one gets the impression of the level of education and expertise he (does not) have. To give him the power he has is dangerous to America. I’m thinking he needs to removed from his high chair and placed back in the play pen.

In the face of an unanswered Republican assault, the Democratic rank-and-file cracked — on the left and the right.

“While we’re all for troop readiness, we’re all for them having all the equipment they want,” Matheson, the Utah Democrat, said, “I’d be very concerned about doing anything that would hamstring resources and commanders on the ground.”

Indeed, Matheson and other Blue Dogs said the Democrats should concentrate on oversight hearings on Iraq policy, while refraining from binding legislation on the war.

They can’t have it both ways. BUT they cannot cut the tools our soldiers and Marines MUST have while they are at war; and the war is real, it’s live, it’s happening. Whether people agree with the merit of this war isn’t up for debate anymore (although some think it is). Now, we have a duty to see the mission in Iraq through- and stand with our military and support them. I think the Lemoncrats are dealing themselves a very sore loser when they ponder ideas of ending this support with these sneaky and unethical deeds and deals being handed by Dumbo Murtha. He needs to GO. Nancy Pelosi needs to cut and run from Murtha and fast. Question is: Does she have the balls to do this?

3 Comments »

Double Standards

U.S. Rep. Mark Foley changed parties after President Regan. He has been out of the closet for a long time. he wants to protect American Kids.

LAND O’LAKES - For 10 years, young people ages 11 to 18 have gathered in Pasco and other Florida counties to pitch tents, swat volleyballs and sing around campfires.

Typical summer camp, save one important distinction: They do it naked.

U.S. Rep. Mark Foley, one of Washington’s leading advocates for missing and exploited kids, doesn’t like the idea of a clothes-free camp for teenagers. After reading a story Wednesday in the New York Times, he decided to raise a fuss.

Foley, running for the U.S. Senate seat held by Bob Graham, plans to deliver letters today to Gov. Jeb Bush and Attorney General Charlie Crist, singling out Lake Como nudist resort in Land O’Lakes, which hosted a bare-skinned youth camp that ended last week.

He Resigned in disgrace last week after it was leaked that he was a disgusting monster. The question I have is why didn’t he resign or get forced out back when the house leader found out about this conduct?

If he doesn’t go to Jail there will be proof that there is to much power in Washington. Also he better lose all of his lifetime benefits and maybe repay all of his wages while in office.

The only good politician is a politician in Leavenworth or sitting in old sparky the electric chair.

Timing sucks for the GOP but why didn’t they take care of his stupid ass back when it happened? I still don’t think the Democraps are any better.

If they would all just start working for Americans instead of the lobbyists we might respect them.

1 Comment »